Cognitive Constraints Increase Estimation Biases: Cognitive Load and Delay in Judgments
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Cognitive biases in moral judgments that affect political behavior
Cognitive biases that affect decision making may affect the decisions of citizens that influence public policy. To the extent that decisions follow principles other than maximizing utility for all, it is less likely that utility will be maximized, and the citizens will ultimately suffer the results. Here I outline some basic arguments concerning decisions by citizens, using voting as an example...
متن کاملCognitive estimation and affective judgments in alcoholic Korsakoff patients.
Alcoholic Korsakoff patients have their most marked deficits in memory, but may exhibit problems in further cognitive and behavioral domains, particularly in so-called frontal lobe functions and on the emotional level. Cognitive estimation is among the frontal lobe-associated functions; nevertheless, the underlying processes of estimation and estimation deficits are still unknown. Additionally,...
متن کاملHow cognitive load affects duration judgments: A meta-analytic review.
A meta-analysis of 117 experiments evaluated the effects of cognitive load on duration judgments. Cognitive load refers to information-processing (attentional or working-memory) demands. Six types of cognitive load were analyzed to resolve ongoing controversies and to test current duration judgment theories. Duration judgments depend on whether or not participants are informed in advance that t...
متن کاملDeliberation's blindsight: how cognitive load can improve judgments.
Multitasking poses a major challenge in modern work environments by putting the worker under cognitive load. Performance decrements often occur when people are under high cognitive load because they switch to less demanding--and often less accurate--cognitive strategies. Although cognitive load disturbs performance over a wide range of tasks, it may also carry benefits. In the experiments repor...
متن کاملObservations on Cognitive Judgments
It is obvious to anyone familiar with the rules of the game of chess that a king on an empty board can reach every square. It is true, but or not obvious, that a knight can reach every square. Why is the first &I fact obvious but the second fact not? This paper presents an analytic. ld theory of a class of obviousness judgments of this type. Whether or not the specifics of this analysis are cor...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: SSRN Electronic Journal
سال: 2014
ISSN: 1556-5068
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2502270